Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: New ship need help.

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Birmingham, AL
    Posts
    15

    New ship need help.

    Ok this is my first attempt to make a ship so I would like somebody to please double check to make sure it was done correctly.

    The ship is a prototype Excalibur-Class Heavy Crusier. It was designed to enter the Gamma Quadrant and help start and then protect some new colonies. Any input would be appreciated.

    Origin: UFP
    Class and Type:Excaliber-Class Heavy Cruiser
    Year Launched: ?

    Structure: 40
    Size/ Decks: 8/ 30
    Length/ Height/ Beam: 610/ 125/ 405
    Complement: 750

    Transporters: 8 Standard, 8 Emergency, 8 Cargo
    Cargo Units: 80
    Shuttlebay: 1 Saucer
    Shuttlrcraft: 8 Size Worth
    Tractor Beams: 1 AV, 1 FV
    Seperation System: No
    Sensor System: Class 4 (+4/ E)
    Operation System: Class 4 (E)
    Life Support System: Class 4 (E)

    Impulse System: Class 8 (.95c) (E)
    Warp System: Class 8 (Warp 8/ 9.6/ 9.982) (E)

    Phaser Banks: Type X (x6/ E)
    Penetration: 7/ 7/ 6/ 0/ 0
    Photon Torpedoes: Type VI (x2/ E)
    Penetration: 5/ 5/ 5/ 5/ 5
    Deflector Shield: Class 7
    Protection Threshold: 17/ 6*

    Manuever Modifiers: +1C, +0H, +4T
    Traits: Enhanced System (Shield Grid)
    Last edited by Curious; 07-12-2002 at 08:08 AM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2002
    Location
    Soviet Canuckistan
    Posts
    3,804
    I don't have my NG with me tonight, but she looks pretty good on spec.

    Nice sizing.

    I think the Torps are a bit undergunned for such a big ship, but that's just me

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Location
    Salinas, Calif., USA (a Chiefs fan in an unholy land)
    Posts
    3,379
    I noticed one thing right off. For your transporters, I noticed you had 5, 4 and 4 for your transporters, and I don't know how many, if any, points you spent on that.

    If you paid a point for additional transporters, you receive your standard allotment for it. Meaning, instead of 5, 4, 4, you would actually have 8, 8, 8.

    My only other nit on this is the classification of the ship, compared to its mission. Personally, I'd classify the Excalibur, as you've presented it, as more of an explorer than a heavy cruiser...especially if it's a post-DW design.
    Davy Jones

    "Frightened? My dear, you are looking at a man who has laughed in the face of death, sneered at doom, and chuckled at catastrophe! I was petrified."
    -- The Wizard of Oz

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Birmingham, AL
    Posts
    15
    Thanks Sea Tyger. I did put a point in transporters but I didnt realize the rule worked like that. I have changed the number of transporters.

    The reason for the classification is that in my campaign I intend for thier to be a philosophical conflict going on in the Federation governement. The "hawks" vs the "explorers". This ship represents a victory for the hawks who want the ship in a high profile position. Thank you for your observations.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •